<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[California Energy Journal: Nuclear]]></title><description><![CDATA[Updates on nuclear energy policy in California.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/s/nuclear</link><generator>Substack</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 04:05:46 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><copyright><![CDATA[Philip MacFarlane]]></copyright><language><![CDATA[en]]></language><webMaster><![CDATA[californiaenergytransition@substack.com]]></webMaster><itunes:owner><itunes:email><![CDATA[californiaenergytransition@substack.com]]></itunes:email><itunes:name><![CDATA[Philip MacFarlane]]></itunes:name></itunes:owner><itunes:author><![CDATA[Philip MacFarlane]]></itunes:author><googleplay:owner><![CDATA[californiaenergytransition@substack.com]]></googleplay:owner><googleplay:email><![CDATA[californiaenergytransition@substack.com]]></googleplay:email><googleplay:author><![CDATA[Philip MacFarlane]]></googleplay:author><itunes:block><![CDATA[Yes]]></itunes:block><item><title><![CDATA[NRC Approves Diablo Canyon License Extension to 2045, Shifting Decision to California Legislature]]></title><description><![CDATA[The NRC approved a 20-year operating license renewal for the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, authorizing operations for the two units until the mid-2040s.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/nrc-approves-diablo-canyon-license</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/nrc-approves-diablo-canyon-license</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 19:46:47 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/e45f3c1b-ea01-4c8b-9d16-def42f04029f_800x500.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) <a href="https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2602/ML26022A077.pdf">approved</a> a 20-year operating license renewal for the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, authorizing operations for the two units until the mid-2040s. State law, however, currently limits operations to 2029 and 2030 unless the state legislature authorizes a further extension.</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe now&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/subscribe?"><span>Subscribe now</span></a></p><p>The federal approval allows Unit 1 to operate until November 2, 2044 and Unit 2 to operate until August 26, 2045. The approval completes the federal licensing process initiated under 2022 legislation to extend operations beyond planned retirement dates. Currently, Unit 1 is authorized to stay open until 2029 and Unit 2 is authorized to stay open until 2030.</p><p><strong>Federal Review Finds No New Environmental or Safety Impacts</strong></p><p>The NRC&#8217;s environmental and safety reviews concluded that continued operations would not result in &#8220;new or significantly different environmental impacts&#8221; beyond those previously analyzed. The agency also determined that the plant can continue to operate safely under existing design parameters, including seismic conditions.</p><p>The renewal is based on continued operation of existing infrastructure rather than new development, reinforcing the agency&#8217;s conclusion that the extension represents a continuation of previously assessed activities rather than a material expansion.</p><p><strong>Plant Received State Approvals Prior to Federal Action</strong></p><p>The federal decision follows a series of state-level approvals required for relicensing. These included permits from the <a href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/coastal-commission-approves-diablo">California Coastal Commission</a>, the California Public Utilities Commission, and the State Lands Commission. In February 2026, the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board granted approval of a water quality permit, clearing the way for the NRC decision.</p><p>Pacific Gas and Electric Company submitted its <a href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/nrc-approves-diablo-canyon-application">license renewal application</a> in November 2023, after <a href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/california-keeps-diablo-canyon-nuclear">SB 846</a> extended the life of the power plant&#8217;s two units by five years to 2029 and 2030.</p><p><strong>Legislature Will Determine Long-Term Operations</strong></p><p>Despite federal approval, California retains decisive authority over whether Diablo Canyon operates beyond 2030. The NRC controls reactor licensing and safety determinations, but state law governs whether the plant may continue operating under those licenses.</p><p>The approval could renew legislative debate over the role of nuclear power in achieving California&#8217;s <a href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/california-implements-more-ambitious-259">statutory target</a> of 100% clean electricity by 2045.</p><p>Diablo Canyon is California&#8217;s largest single source of electricity, supplying roughly 10% of total in-state generation and about 16% of zero-carbon power in 2024, according to data cited in the approval process.</p><p>Governor Gavin Newsom supported the NRC decision, stating it aligns with California&#8217;s clean energy and economic objectives. &#8220;Today, I welcome the Nuclear Regulatory Commission&#8217;s approval as we continue California&#8217;s clean energy transition, creating good-paying jobs, fighting climate change and cementing the Golden State as a global powerhouse,&#8221; he <a href="https://www.gov.ca.gov/2026/04/02/governor-newsom-welcomes-approval-of-diablo-canyon-license-renewals-delivering-on-californias-commitment-to-a-clean-and-reliable-grid/">said</a>.</p><div class="subscription-widget-wrap-editor" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe&quot;,&quot;language&quot;:&quot;en&quot;}" data-component-name="SubscribeWidgetToDOM"><div class="subscription-widget show-subscribe"><div class="preamble"><p class="cta-caption"><em>California Energy Journal</em> is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></div><form class="subscription-widget-subscribe"><input type="email" class="email-input" name="email" placeholder="Type your email&#8230;" tabindex="-1"><input type="submit" class="button primary" value="Subscribe"><div class="fake-input-wrapper"><div class="fake-input"></div><div class="fake-button"></div></div></form></div></div><p></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Coastal Commission Approves Diablo Canyon Extension Plan]]></title><link>https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/coastal-commission-approves-diablo</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/coastal-commission-approves-diablo</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 23:30:20 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/dfb13745-222f-46d2-8758-73b83c195613_800x500.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The California Coastal Commission approved a plan to extend the life of the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant by at least five years.</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe now&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/subscribe?"><span>Subscribe now</span></a></p><p>The Commission voted 9-3 to approve Pacific Gas and Electric&#8217;s (PG&amp;E) request for a federal consistency certification and a state coastal development permit as part of a plan to place 4,000 acres of land into conservation. The approvals were needed to gain Federal approval for a 20-year relicensing permit.</p><p>In November, the Commission <a href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/coastal-commission-refuses-permits">declined</a> PG&amp;E&#8217;s request for approval of the plan at a November 6, 2025 <a href="https://www.coastal.ca.gov/meetings/agenda/#/2025/11">meeting</a>. The Commission rejected its own staff recommendation and said PG&amp;E must place thousands of acres of land into conservation for approval of the coastal development permit.</p><p>PG&amp;E <a href="https://www.pge.com/en/newsroom/currents/future-of-energy/state-coastal-commission-approves-diablo-canyon-certification0.html">agreed</a> to do the following:</p><ul><li><p>Protect&#8239;4,500 acres&#8239;of North Ranch through conservation easements and potential transfer to expand Monta&#241;a de Oro State Park by 50%, or transfer to other tribal or public entities;</p></li><li><p>Establish a purchase&#8239;option&#8239;for Wild Cherry Canyon, enabling potential future conservation;</p></li><li><p>Dedicate 25 miles of new public trails, including Point&#8239;Buchon&#8239;and Pecho Coast loops, San Luis Hill access, and a through-trail linking Monta&#241;a de Oro to Port San Luis;</p></li><li><p>Contribute $10M for trail development, maintenance, and stewardship;</p></li><li><p>Commit not to sell South Ranch lands until 2040, ensuring Commission oversight during decommissioning.</p></li></ul><p>If Diablo Canyon&#8217;s operations continue after 2030, additional conservation measures would include the expansion of the South Ranch conservation deed restrictions to 2,490 acres, covering all coastal zone lands. PG&amp;E would also provide government agencies, nonprofits and&#8239;California Native American Tribes&#8239;first purchase rights for all 5,000 acres of South Ranch, with mandatory conservation easements.</p><p>The federal consistency certification is needed for a new 20-year federal operating licenses is for Diablo Canyon&#8217;s two electricity generating units, Unit 1 and Unit 2. The coastal development permit is needed for operation of the generating units for an additional five years to 2029 and 2030, as authorized under <a href="https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB846">SB 846</a>.</p><div class="subscription-widget-wrap-editor" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe&quot;,&quot;language&quot;:&quot;en&quot;}" data-component-name="SubscribeWidgetToDOM"><div class="subscription-widget show-subscribe"><div class="preamble"><p class="cta-caption"><em>California Energy Journal</em> is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></div><form class="subscription-widget-subscribe"><input type="email" class="email-input" name="email" placeholder="Type your email&#8230;" tabindex="-1"><input type="submit" class="button primary" value="Subscribe"><div class="fake-input-wrapper"><div class="fake-input"></div><div class="fake-button"></div></div></form></div></div><p></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Coastal Commission Refuses Permits for Diablo Canyon without Additional Land Conservation]]></title><link>https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/coastal-commission-refuses-permits</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/coastal-commission-refuses-permits</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 22:07:02 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/d784034e-b405-4651-8931-97be867f7de6_800x500.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The California Coastal Commission declined Pacific Gas &amp; Electric&#8217;s (PG&amp;E) request for a federal consistency certification and a state coastal development permit, both of which are needed for a new 20-year operating license for the Diablo Canyon Power Plant.</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe now&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/subscribe?"><span>Subscribe now</span></a></p><p>The Commission did not accept its staff recommendation to approve the requests at the November 6, 2025 <a href="https://www.coastal.ca.gov/meetings/agenda/#/2025/11">meeting</a>, but instead said PG&amp;E must place thousands of acres of land into conservation for approval of the coastal development permit. The land is needed to mitigate the impact of the plant&#8217;s cooling system, which uses about 2.5 billion gallons of seawater per day, <a href="https://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/environment/article312794910.html">according</a> to the <em>San Luis Obispo Tribune</em>.</p><p>The federal consistency certification is needed for a new 20-year federal operating licenses is for Diablo Canyon&#8217;s two electricity generating units, Unit 1 and Unit 2. The coastal development permit is needed for operation of the generating units for an additional five years to 2029 and 2030, as authorized under <a href="https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB846">SB 846</a>.</p><p>The Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant is the largest power source in California and provides 8.6% of the state&#8217;s electricity, including approximately 17% of its zero-emissions electricity. The plant&#8217;s two units were scheduled to be retired in 2024 and 2025, but concerns over anticipated power shortages during the state&#8217;s transition to renewable energy led to growing support for keeping it <span>open. (See </span><a href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/california-keeps-diablo-canyon-nuclear"><span>California Keeps Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Open</span></a><span>.)</span></p><p>The two sides must still negotiate the timing and process of the land conservation deal. The Coastal Commission will decide on an updated mitigation plan in December.</p><div class="subscription-widget-wrap-editor" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe&quot;,&quot;language&quot;:&quot;en&quot;}" data-component-name="SubscribeWidgetToDOM"><div class="subscription-widget show-subscribe"><div class="preamble"><p class="cta-caption"><em>California Energy Journal</em> is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></div><form class="subscription-widget-subscribe"><input type="email" class="email-input" name="email" placeholder="Type your email&#8230;" tabindex="-1"><input type="submit" class="button primary" value="Subscribe"><div class="fake-input-wrapper"><div class="fake-input"></div><div class="fake-button"></div></div></form></div></div><p></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bill for Development of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors Introduced]]></title><link>https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/bill-for-development-of-small-modular</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/bill-for-development-of-small-modular</guid><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 21:11:41 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/a3fcce25-3212-4cb5-82dd-241a8573927b_640x490.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/bill-for-development-of-small-modular">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Diablo Canyon $400 Million Loan Survives Budget Negotiations]]></title><link>https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/diablo-canyon-400-million-loan-survives</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/diablo-canyon-400-million-loan-survives</guid><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2024 19:51:04 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/d2441c2f-972d-40fd-9193-a33aceb9b583_800x500.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/diablo-canyon-400-million-loan-survives">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Appeals Court Dismisses Suit Challenging NRC on Diablo Canyon]]></title><link>https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/appeals-court-dismisses-suit-challenging</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/appeals-court-dismisses-suit-challenging</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 21:41:40 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/5f4368cd-eb02-4bf2-a1aa-de569bad8100_800x500.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/appeals-court-dismisses-suit-challenging">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[NRC Approves Diablo Canyon Application]]></title><link>https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/nrc-approves-diablo-canyon-application</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/nrc-approves-diablo-canyon-application</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2023 21:28:29 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/cb394174-bcae-42e0-9970-545755860d3e_800x500.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/nrc-approves-diablo-canyon-application">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[CPUC Extends Diablo Canyon Operations Until 2030]]></title><link>https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/cpuc-extends-diablo-canyon-operations</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/cpuc-extends-diablo-canyon-operations</guid><pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 16:00:56 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/30a8f6a9-a902-4dbd-93de-890cf3287b03_800x500.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/cpuc-extends-diablo-canyon-operations">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[PG&E Files Federal Relicensing Application to Extend Diablo Canyon]]></title><link>https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/pg-and-e-files-federal-relicensing</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/pg-and-e-files-federal-relicensing</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2023 20:17:52 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/9a32e072-3b86-466d-b065-5acc809b8402_800x500.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/pg-and-e-files-federal-relicensing">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[California Includes Fusion in Energy Policy Reports]]></title><description><![CDATA[Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law AB 1172, which requires the California Energy Commission (CEC) to evaluate various fusion technologies and to analyze the feasibility of using nuclear fusion in the state as part of its 2027 integrated energy policy report (IEPR).]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/california-includes-fusion-in-energy</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/california-includes-fusion-in-energy</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 21:30:06 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/81dc8151-268a-48d4-baaa-4188a68c981c_684x484.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/california-includes-fusion-in-energy">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[NRC Rejects Request to Shut Down Diablo Canyon]]></title><description><![CDATA[The Nuclear Regulatory Commission rejected a request to shut down a nuclear reactor at the 2,250 MW Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant. The NRC, in an October 3, 2023 decision, took no action on the request from two environmental groups to shut down the Unit 1 reactor immediately. Friends of the Earth and Mothers for Peace filed a petition in September to shut down the plant.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/nrc-rejects-request-to-shut-down</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/nrc-rejects-request-to-shut-down</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2023 22:32:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/937c1c5e-7274-4788-893d-5e1f48a419aa_800x500.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/nrc-rejects-request-to-shut-down">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Court Rejects Environmental Group Suit to Close Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant]]></title><link>https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/court-rejects-environmental-group</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/court-rejects-environmental-group</guid><pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2023 18:16:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/4a2b4be2-cb3e-4a2e-a42f-b3780319362f_800x500.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/court-rejects-environmental-group">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Environmental Group Sues to Close Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant ]]></title><description><![CDATA[An environmental group is suing Pacific Gas & Electric to stop it from extending the federal operating licenses for the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant. In a complaint filed in San Francisco Superior Court, Friends of the Earth asked the court for injunctive relief to prohibit PG&E from violating a 2016 agreement to close the nuclear power plant by 2025.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/environmental-group-sues-to-close</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/environmental-group-sues-to-close</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 15:35:09 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/f4a78bba-4771-43ef-931f-9a252907403a_800x500.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/environmental-group-sues-to-close">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Federal Regulator Extends License for Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant]]></title><description><![CDATA[Federal regulators extended the license for the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant past its scheduled closing date in 2025 while the agency considers its license renewal application. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission granted Diablo Canyon an exemption from the requirements to submit a license renewal application as long as it submits a license renewal application by December 31, 2023. If granted, the license renewal would authorize continued operation for up to 20 years.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/federal-regulators-extend-license</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/federal-regulators-extend-license</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2023 21:22:34 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/e70ddec7-1fa1-47a3-981b-98176e0e1277_800x500.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/federal-regulators-extend-license">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[PG&E to Receive $1.1 Billion to Keep Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant Open]]></title><link>https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/pg-and-e-to-receive-11-billion-to</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/pg-and-e-to-receive-11-billion-to</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 23:09:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://bucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/b1ad09ea-b959-46b3-8815-dac3223161b2_800x500.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Department of Energy <a href="https://www.energy.gov/articles/biden-harris-administration-announces-major-investment-preserve-americas-clean-nuclear">announced</a> that the Diablo Canyon Power Plant will receive up to $1.1 billion in the first round of funding from the Civil Nuclear Credit (CNC) Program. Units 1 and 2 of the plant were scheduled to be decommissioned in 2024 and in 2025. The final terms of the grant will be negotiated, but the funds will be distributed from 2023 through 2026. While not assuring continued operation of the plant, the funds create &#8220;a path forward for Diablo Canyon to remain open.&#8221;</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe now&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/subscribe?"><span>Subscribe now</span></a></p><p>In September, Governor Newsom signed into law&nbsp;<a href="https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB846">SB 846</a>, which extended the life of the 2,250 MW Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant&#8217;s two units by five years to 2029 and 2030. The legislation also authorized a forgivable $1.4 billion loan for plant owner Pacific Gas &amp; Electric (PG&amp;E). The law also required the Diablo Canyon plant to secure funds from the U.S. Department of Energy or other federal sources to pay back the loan<span>. (See </span><a href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/california-keeps-diablo-canyon-nuclear"><span>California Keeps Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Open</span></a><span>.)</span></p><p>To obtain the loan, the plant was required to qualify for the U.S. Department of Energy&#8217;s $6 billion CNC program by March 1, 2023. The CNC program, which is funded by the Inflation Reduction Act, was implemented to support the continued operations of nuclear energy facilities. PG&amp;E applied for the funds on October 31, 2022.</p><div class="subscription-widget-wrap-editor" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe&quot;,&quot;language&quot;:&quot;en&quot;}" data-component-name="SubscribeWidgetToDOM"><div class="subscription-widget show-subscribe"><div class="preamble"><p class="cta-caption">The <em>California Energy Journal </em>is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></div><form class="subscription-widget-subscribe"><input type="email" class="email-input" name="email" placeholder="Type your email&#8230;" tabindex="-1"><input type="submit" class="button primary" value="Subscribe"><div class="fake-input-wrapper"><div class="fake-input"></div><div class="fake-button"></div></div></form></div></div>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nuclear Power Provided 10% of California’s Electricity in 2021, EIA Reports]]></title><link>https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/eia-nuclear-power-provided-10-of</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/eia-nuclear-power-provided-10-of</guid><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 15:26:37 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://bucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/1bda5530-fb4e-473e-a3f0-24d30ab1c08f_800x500.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/eia-nuclear-power-provided-10-of">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[California Keeps Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Open]]></title><description><![CDATA[Legislation keeps nuclear power plant open for an additional five years beyond its scheduled closing in 2024 and 2025.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/california-keeps-diablo-canyon-nuclear</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/california-keeps-diablo-canyon-nuclear</guid><pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2022 19:17:05 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://bucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/273622ed-0428-49a9-9989-879ac6557a67_800x500.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/california-keeps-diablo-canyon-nuclear">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newsom Introduces Bill to Keep Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Open]]></title><description><![CDATA[Proposed bill would keep the plant open for 5 to 10 years, provide funding through a forgivable loan, and streamline regulatory approval of an extension.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/newsom-introduces-bill-to-keep-diablo</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/newsom-introduces-bill-to-keep-diablo</guid><pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2022 14:38:45 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://bucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/28f447b4-3719-43e3-a525-b285f5a86eb3_800x500.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergyjournal.com/p/newsom-introduces-bill-to-keep-diablo">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>